Aviv Ronen | Beckermus Technologies: Your chip is overheating. Why can't printed circuits cool it down like a normal PCB?
11:46 - 12:50
Other snippets from this talk
Summary of the clip:
Your chip is overheating. Why can't printed circuits cool it down like a normal PCB?
A critical challenge in printed and flexible electronics is thermal management, especially when integrating power-hungry chips. If your chip generates heat, that thermal energy must be dissipated effectively to prevent performance degradation or failure. The interconnection material and the substrate traces play a major role in this heat dissipation pathway, and this is where printed electronics differ significantly from traditional PCBs.
In a standard PCB, the conductive traces are made of thick, solid bulk copper, which has excellent thermal conductivity. This allows heat to be drawn away from the chip and spread across the board efficiently. In contrast, the conductive traces in printed electronics are fundamentally different. They are not bulk metal but rather a composite material, consisting of conductive flakes (like silver or copper) suspended within a polymer resin binder.
This composite structure creates a significant thermal bottleneck. While the metal flakes touch, creating an electrical path, the presence of the resin and the imperfect contact between flakes drastically reduces the material's overall thermal conductivity. As a result, heat gets trapped around the chip because the printed traces cannot carry it away effectively. This makes thermal management a primary design constraint and requires careful selection of interconnection materials with the highest possible thermal conductivity to compensate.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The structural difference between traditional PCB traces and printed conductive traces.
* Why the composite nature of printed inks leads to poor thermal conductivity.
* The importance of selecting interconnection materials that can help dissipate heat.
๐ **Clip Abstract** Discover the critical thermal management challenges unique to printed electronics. This analysis reveals why the thin, composite nature of printed traces makes them far less effective at heat dissipation than traditional PCBs, posing a major hurdle for high-power applications.
๐ Link in comments ๐
#PrintedElectronicsThermalManagement, #CompositeConductiveInks, #ThermalBottleneck, #PrintedTraceThermalConductivity, #FlexibleElectronics, #WearableElectronics
This is a highlight of the presentation:
More Highlights from the same talk.
10:21 - 11:45
Why do your flexible hybrid electronics crack and fail under stress?
Why do your flexible hybrid electronics crack and fail under stress?
When integrating rigid silicon chips onto flexible substrates, you introduce significant thermomechanical challenges that can lead to premature failure. Simple mechanical stress from bending or stretching the device can easily tear the delicate, hair-thin wires used in wire bonding or induce micro-cracks in the rigid solder or adhesive joints used for flip-chip mounting. This is a primary failure mode that must be considered in the design phase, often requiring protective encapsulants like glob-top epoxy to reinforce the interconnects.
The problem is compounded by a fundamental materials science issue: the mismatch in the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) between the chip and the substrate. A silicon chip expands and contracts very little with temperature changes, while a polymer-based flexible substrate expands and contracts significantly more. This disparity creates immense internal stress every time the device heats up and cools down, both during manufacturing and in real-world operation.
During assembly, the components are heated to cure adhesives or reflow solder. As the assembly cools, the substrate shrinks more than the chip, pulling on the interconnects and creating residual stress. This built-in stress acts as a starting point for failure, making the joints highly susceptible to cracking over the product's lifecycle, whether it's designed to last for one year or twenty. Understanding and mitigating these thermomechanical stresses is paramount for creating reliable flexible electronic devices.
In this short video, you can learn:
* How mechanical flexing can destroy wire bonds and flip-chip joints.
* The concept of Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) mismatch.
* Why thermal cycling during manufacturing creates inherent stress in hybrid assemblies.
๐ **Clip Abstract** This clip explains the primary thermomechanical failure modes in flexible hybrid electronics. It covers how both physical bending and mismatched thermal expansion between chips and substrates can lead to cracked joints and torn interconnects.
๐ Link in comments ๐
#FlexibleHybridElectronics, #ThermomechanicalStress, #CTEMismatch, #InterconnectReliability, #PrintedElectronics, #WearableElectronics
13:17 - 14:47
Your solder joint looks perfect, but is it secretly a failure waiting to happen?
Your solder joint looks perfect, but is it secretly a failure waiting to happen?
Achieving a reliable solder joint goes far beyond simply melting the solder and getting it to "wet" the pad. The real key to a strong, long-lasting connection lies in the formation of a specific microscopic layer at the interface between the solder and the substrate's conductive pad. Without this layer, the joint is mechanically weak and will eventually fail.
This critical layer is called the Intermetallic Compound (IMC). It is not simply solder sitting on top of copper; it is a new, distinct alloy formed by a chemical reaction between elements from the solder (like tin) and the pad (like copper). A good connection requires not just the presence of an IMC, but the formation of the correct chemical phase and thickness, as defined by industry standards like IPC for traditional electronics.
To truly validate the reliability of an assembly, especially on novel printed substrates where standards are still emerging, a simple visual inspection is not enough. You must perform a micro-section analysisโslicing through the joint and examining it under a microscopeโto confirm that the correct IMC (e.g., the Sn3Cu4 phase for tin-copper systems) has formed properly. This metallurgical verification is the only way to know if you have a truly reliable system, as a visually perfect joint can completely lack the necessary micro-structural integrity.
In this short video, you can learn:
* What an Intermetallic Compound (IMC) is and why it's critical for solder reliability.
* Why visual inspection of a solder joint is insufficient for reliability testing.
* The necessity of micro-section analysis to verify the correct IMC phase.
๐ **Clip Abstract** This clip provides a deep dive into the materials science of solder joint reliability. It explains that a successful connection depends on the formation of a specific Intermetallic Compound (IMC) at the micro-level, a factor that can only be verified through cross-section analysis.
๐ Link in comments ๐
#SolderJointReliability, #IntermetallicCompound, #MicrosectionAnalysis, #IMCPhase, #PrintedElectronics, #FlexibleElectronics