top of page

Ethan Secor

Iowa State University

* All members of the platform can watch the entire presentation.

 

Please register to become a member.

Ethan Secor | Iowa State University: What are the advantages of using closed-loop control in aerosol jet printing to mitigate long-term process drift?

00:07:37 - 00:08:24

Other snippets from this talk

Summary of the clip:

What are the advantages of using closed-loop control in aerosol jet printing to mitigate long-term process drift?

The speaker transitions to discussing the implementation of closed-loop control using the real-time sensor data. The goal is to automate the adjustment of process parameters to maintain consistent printing performance without manual intervention. The sensor data is connected to the printer control software, enabling it to adjust process parameters, such as the atomizer gas flow rate, on the fly.

A 12-hour print test was conducted using this closed-loop control system. The software automatically adjusted the atomizer gas flow rate to maintain a steady real-time sensor measurement. The results showed a significant improvement in consistency compared to open-loop printing, with a good reduction in long-term drift. While some drift remained (a couple percent per hour), the closed-loop system demonstrated its ability to mitigate the effects of process variations.

By using closed-loop control, the system can automatically compensate for process drift, leading to more consistent printing results over extended periods. This reduces the need for manual adjustments and improves the overall reliability of the aerosol jet printing process. The closed-loop system effectively maintains the desired deposition rate by dynamically adjusting process parameters based on real-time sensor feedback.

In this short video, you can learn:
* How real-time sensor data is used for closed-loop control in aerosol jet printing.
* The benefits of closed-loop control in mitigating long-term process drift.
* The results of a 12-hour print test using a closed-loop control system.
๐Ÿ“‹ **Clip Abstract** This segment explains the implementation of closed-loop control in aerosol jet printing, using real-time sensor data to automatically adjust process parameters. It demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach in reducing long-term process drift and improving printing consistency.
๐Ÿ”— Link in comments ๐Ÿ‘‡

#AerosolJetPrinting, #ClosedLoopControl, #ProcessDriftMitigation, #RealTimeProcessControl, #SemiconductorManufacturing, #AdvancedPackaging

This is a highlight of the presentation:

Advancing manufacturing readiness of aerosol jet printing for conformal electronics

The Future of Electronics RESHAPED USA | Boston 2093

UMass Boston

Organised By:

TechBlick

More Highlights from the same talk.

00:02:04 - 00:03:17

How can an aerosol printing system deposit 20-micron lines through a 100-micron nozzle without ever clogging?

How can an aerosol printing system deposit 20-micron lines through a 100-micron nozzle without ever clogging?

Ethan Secor details the fundamental physics of Aerosol Jet (AJ) printing, highlighting the process of atomizing liquid inks into 1 to 5-micron droplet mists. These micron-scale droplets are suspended and transported via a carrier gas directly into the printhead.

The core of this technology lies in the dynamic interaction between the carrier gas and a surrounding sheath gas. By introducing a clean sheath gas ring, the system constrains the aerosol stream to the center of the nozzle, preventing physical contact between the ink droplets and the nozzle walls.

This unique aerodynamic focusing allows operators to print features dramatically smaller than the nozzle aperture itself. For instance, a 100-micron nozzle can easily generate 20 to 30-micron feature widths, completely bypassing the clogging issues that plague conventional micro-dispensing systems.

In this short video, you can learn:
* How 1-5 micron droplets are generated and transported using carrier gas dynamics
* The mechanics of sheath gas focusing in preventing nozzle clogging and wear
* The relationship between physical nozzle diameter and the final printed line width

๐Ÿ“‹ **Clip Abstract** [This clip explains the foundational mechanics of aerosol jet printing, focusing on how a carrier and sheath gas system aerodynamically focuses droplets. It demonstrates how fine lines are patterned without physical nozzle-wall contact, reducing contamination and clogging risks.]
๐Ÿ”— Link in comments ๐Ÿ‘‡

#AerosolJetPrinting, #AerodynamicFocusing, #SheathGasDynamics, #MicroDispensing, #PrintedElectronics, #AdditiveElectronics

00:14:30 - 00:16:39

Why do high-vapor-pressure solvent inks cause "false negative" deposition failures in aerosol jetting?

Why do high-vapor-pressure solvent inks cause "false negative" deposition failures in aerosol jetting?

Ethan Secor examines the rapid evaporation thermodynamics governing aerosol droplets during flight. Because of their high surface-area-to-volume ratio, 1-5 micron droplets evaporate on a millisecond timescale when exposed to dry sheath gases.

If an ink dries out too quickly, the droplets lose their mass and inertia, failing to impact the target substrateโ€”a phenomenon known as a "false negative" deposition. To counter this, ink formulators must incorporate a 5% to 20% concentration of a low-volatility co-solvent.

However, balancing this solvent ratio is critical. An excess of low-volatility co-solvent yields a wet, low-viscosity deposition that becomes highly unstable under the high-velocity (50 to 100 m/s) carrier gas jet, leading to splattering and reduced feature resolution.

In this short video, you can learn:
* The sub-millisecond evaporation thermodynamics of micron-scale droplets in flight
* How to resolve "false negative" printing errors using low-volatility co-solvents
* The hydrodynamic balance required to prevent deposit instability under high-velocity gas jets

๐Ÿ“‹ **Clip Abstract** [This clip explores the rapid drying physics of aerosol droplets and the critical role of ink formulation. It highlights how balancing low-volatility co-solvents is necessary to avoid both complete dry-out and wet film displacement.]
๐Ÿ”— Link in comments ๐Ÿ‘‡

#AerosolJetPrinting, #DropletEvaporation, #CoSolventFormulation, #DepositionInstability, #PrintedElectronics, #AdditiveElectronics

00:09:48 - 00:11:32

How do you choose between ultrasonic and pneumatic atomization for high-viscosity electronic ink printing?

How do you choose between ultrasonic and pneumatic atomization for high-viscosity electronic ink printing?

Ethan Secor compares the performance envelopes, viscosity limits, and operational scales of ultrasonic versus pneumatic atomizers. Ultrasonic atomization excels in low-volume, high-precision environments, typically handling low-viscosity fluids up to 10 centipoise.

Conversely, pneumatic atomizers leverage high-pressure gas flows to handle moderate to high viscosities, comfortably processing fluids up to 100 centipoise and even solvent-free UV-curable acrylates. This capability is critical for depositing structural dielectrics and functional epoxies.

The choice between these two methods dictates the system's throughput, minimum line width, and overall reliability. Understanding these scaling behaviors allows materials scientists to formulate inks that align with target resolution and volumetric deposition requirements.

In this short video, you can learn:
* The operational differences and volume capacities of ultrasonic and pneumatic systems
* Viscosity limits and material constraints for printing solvent-free UV-curable polymers
* The trade-offs between high-resolution precision and maximum volumetric deposition rates

๐Ÿ“‹ **Clip Abstract** [This segment provides a detailed comparison of ultrasonic and pneumatic atomization techniques used in aerosol printing. It outlines critical trade-offs in ink volume, viscosity ceilings, and line-width resolutions to assist in system selection.]
๐Ÿ”— Link in comments ๐Ÿ‘‡

#UltrasonicAtomization, #PneumaticAtomization, #HighViscosityInks, #AerosolJetPrinting, #PrintedElectronics, #AdditiveElectronics

More Snippets
CONTACT US

KGH Concepts GmbH

Mergenthalerallee 73-75, 65760, Eschborn

+49 17661704139

venessa@techblick.com

TechBlick is owned and operated by KGH Concepts GmbH

Registration number HRB 121362

VAT number: DE 337022439

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Sign up for our newsletter to receive updates on our latest speakers and events AND to receive analyst-written summaries of the key talks and happenings in our events.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2026 by KGH Concepts GmbH

bottom of page