top of page

Guosheng Li

Pacific Northwest National Lab

* All members of the platform can watch the entire presentation.

 

Please register to become a member.

Guosheng Li | Pacific Northwest National Lab: How can you use the same Fe2+/Fe3+ redox couple for both the anolyte and catholyte in a flow battery?

00:02:05 - 00:03:40

Other snippets from this talk

Summary of the clip:

How can you use the same Fe2+/Fe3+ redox couple for both the anolyte and catholyte in a flow battery?

Conventional iron flow batteries face a major challenge with their anode, which relies on iron plating and stripping. This process is inefficient, can lead to morphology changes, and fundamentally prevents the complete decoupling of power and energy, a key advantage of flow batteries. Most of the technical hurdles originate from this solid-phase reaction on the anode side.

A recent trend aims to replace this plating/stripping chemistry with a fully soluble redox chemistry, similar to the well-known vanadium flow battery. The challenge is that iron only has one soluble redox couple (Fe2+/Fe3+), whereas typical flow batteries use two different couples for the anolyte and catholyte (e.g., V2+/V3+ and V4+/V5+).

The solution lies in coordination chemistry. By selecting appropriate ligands to form complexes with the iron ions, it's possible to shift the redox potential of the Fe2+/Fe3+ couple. Using one ligand for the anolyte and a different ligand for the catholyte can split the potential of the same underlying redox couple, creating a sufficient voltage window for a functional all-soluble iron flow battery.

In this short video, you can learn:
* The primary limitation of conventional iron flow batteries.
* The challenge of creating an all-soluble iron battery with only one redox couple.
* How coordination chemistry and ligands can be used to manipulate redox potentials.
๐Ÿ“‹ **Clip Abstract** Conventional iron flow batteries are limited by inefficient iron plating/stripping on the anode. This clip explains how coordination chemistry can be used to create an all-soluble iron flow battery by using different ligands to shift the redox potential of the same Fe2+/Fe3+ couple for the anolyte and catholyte.
๐Ÿ”— Link in comments ๐Ÿ‘‡

#AllSolubleIronFlowBattery, #CoordinationChemistry, #RedoxPotentialShifting, #LigandEngineering, #RedoxFlowBatteries, #GridEnergyStorage

This is a highlight of the presentation:

Aqueous all soluble Fe redox flow batteries for large scale energy storage applications

Batteries RESHAPED 2026

11-12 February 2026

Online | TechBlick platform

Organised By:

TechBlick

More Highlights from the same talk.

00:06:36 - 00:07:49

Why does this promising iron-complex anolyte suddenly show a voltage jump at high charging rates?

Why does this promising iron-complex anolyte suddenly show a voltage jump at high charging rates?

To test the performance of a new phosphonate-based anolyte (Iron-NTMPA), it was paired with a standard iron-cyanide catholyte in a full flow battery cell. A staircase experiment, where the current density was incrementally increased up to 100 mA/cmยฒ and then decreased, was performed to evaluate its rate capability. The results showed that the capacity was relatively stable, recovering well after being subjected to high currents.

However, a detailed analysis of the voltage profiles revealed an unexpected phenomenon. At higher current densities, a distinct and significant voltage jump appeared during the charging process. This indicates a kinetic limitation or a change in the reaction mechanism under high-rate conditions, which could negatively impact the battery's efficiency and performance.

To isolate the source of this voltage jump, a symmetric cell was constructed using only the Iron-NTMPA electrolyte for both the positive and negative sides. The symmetric cell experiment clearly reproduced the voltage jump during both charge and discharge. This confirmed that the kinetic bottleneck originates specifically from the Iron-NTMPA anolyte chemistry and not from the iron-cyanide catholyte or cell interactions.

In this short video, you can learn:
* How to evaluate the rate capability of a new flow battery chemistry.
* The identification of a kinetic limitation (voltage jump) at high current densities.
* The use of symmetric cell testing to isolate the source of a performance issue.
๐Ÿ“‹ **Clip Abstract** This clip details the electrochemical testing of a new Iron-NTMPA anolyte, which reveals a significant voltage jump at high charging rates. Through symmetric cell analysis, the anolyte itself is identified as the source of this kinetic limitation, setting the stage for further investigation.
๐Ÿ”— Link in comments ๐Ÿ‘‡

#IronNTMPA, #VoltageJump, #SymmetricCellTesting, #AnolyteKinetics, #FlowBatteries, #RateCapability

00:08:48 - 00:11:01

Can computational modeling predict and solve kinetic bottlenecks in flow battery electrolytes?

Can computational modeling predict and solve kinetic bottlenecks in flow battery electrolytes?

Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations revealed the root cause of the voltage jump in the Iron-NTMPA complex. The Fe(III) state can exist in two similar-energy coordination structures (S1 and S2), while the Fe(II) state strongly prefers the S1 structure. At low currents, the S2 Fe(III) has time to convert to S1 before reacting, but at high currents, this interconversion is too slow, forcing the S2 Fe(III) to react directly, which requires a higher overpotential and causes the voltage jump.

Armed with this understanding, a new ligand, BPMG, was rationally designed to solve the problem. In BPMG, one of the three phosphonate groups of NTMPA is replaced by a carboxylate group. DFT calculations for the Iron-BPMG complex showed a large energy difference between the S1 and S2 structures for the Fe(III) state, meaning it strongly favors the S1 state, just like the Fe(II) state.

With both the Fe(II) and Fe(III) states of the Iron-BPMG complex preferring the same S1 coordination structure, the need for slow ligand reorientation during high-rate charging is eliminated. This molecular-level design change prevents the kinetic bottleneck. As a result, the Iron-BPMG complex does not exhibit the performance-limiting voltage jump, leading to higher energy efficiency and better high-current response.

In this short video, you can learn:
* How DFT calculations can explain complex reaction mechanisms like ligand reorientation.
* The principle of rational ligand design to overcome kinetic limitations.
* The specific molecular modification (phosphonate to carboxylate) that solved the voltage jump issue.
๐Ÿ“‹ **Clip Abstract** This clip showcases how DFT calculations were used to identify a slow ligand reorientation as the cause of a kinetic bottleneck in an iron-complex anolyte. A new ligand was then rationally designed to favor a single coordination state, successfully eliminating the issue and improving battery performance.
๐Ÿ”— Link in comments ๐Ÿ‘‡

#DFTCalculations, #RationalLigandDesign, #IronComplexAnolyte, #KineticBottlenecks, #FlowBatteries, #RedoxFlow

More Snippets
CONTACT US

KGH Concepts GmbH

Mergenthalerallee 73-75, 65760, Eschborn

+49 17661704139

venessa@techblick.com

TechBlick is owned and operated by KGH Concepts GmbH

Registration number HRB 121362

VAT number: DE 337022439

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Sign up for our newsletter to receive updates on our latest speakers and events AND to receive analyst-written summaries of the key talks and happenings in our events.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2026 by KGH Concepts GmbH

bottom of page