Martin Hedges | Neotech AMT: Can we achieve an 80% reduction in bill-of-materials complexity by redesigning consumer products for additive manufacturing?
07:14 - 09:02
Other snippets from this talk
Summary of the clip:
Can we achieve an 80% reduction in bill-of-materials complexity by redesigning consumer products for additive manufacturing?
Traditional consumer electronic assemblies, even simple ones like LED light bulbs, rely on a highly complex and fragmented bill of materials. These devices contain glass covers, rigid FR4 or metal-core circuit boards, copper wiring, structural adhesive resins, and steel support wires, each requiring dedicated and geographically distributed supply chains. This material diversity complicates end-of-life recycling and introduces multiple interfaces prone to mechanical and thermal failure.
Shifting to a fully additive manufacturing model allows developers to compress this complex bill of materials down to just three fundamental inputs: a single structural polymer, a single conductive circuit ink, and standard surface-mount devices. By depositing the circuit traces directly onto the printed structural body, the need for separate PCBs, wiring harnesses, and mounting brackets is entirely eliminated. This results in an estimated 80% reduction in material types for the device.
Beyond material reduction, this approach radically simplifies the manufacturing supply chain by consolidating multiple processing steps into a single, automated printing cell. Moving from raw materials to a finished, functional mechatronic system in a single manufacturing system lowers transportation costs, reduces waste, and enables localized, on-demand production.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The material breakdown of traditional electronic devices compared to an additively manufactured alternative.
* How 3D printing can eliminate up to 80% of the material types from a standard bill of materials.
* The supply chain advantages of consolidating multiple manufacturing steps into a single, localized additive process.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This clip demonstrates the environmental and supply chain benefits of 3D printed electronics using a sustainable lamp proof of concept. It highlights how consolidating structures and circuits can lead to an 80% reduction in material diversity and compress highly fragmented supply chains into a single additive production process.
#3DPrintedElectronics, #StructuralElectronics, #ConductiveInks, #AdditiveManufacturingElectronics, #PrintedElectronics, #SustainableElectronics
This is a highlight of the presentation:
More Highlights from the same talk.
01:38 - 02:49
Can we completely eliminate the planar PCB by printing electronics directly into structural components?
Can we completely eliminate the planar PCB by printing electronics directly into structural components?
Traditional electronics design remains bound to two-dimensional planar circuit boards, forcing mechanical engineers to design enclosures around rigid rectangular shapes. Three-dimensional printed electronics disrupts this paradigm by integrating conductive traces and surface-mount devices directly onto or within three-dimensional structural elements. This fusion of electrical and mechanical design creates integrated mechatronic systems that maximize volume efficiency.
The transition to 3D printed electronics occurs through two distinct processing pathways depending on the manufacturing requirements. The first approach utilizes existing structural substrates, such as injection-molded plastics, composite parts, or castings, and manipulates the printing and pick-and-place tools in 3D space to deposit circuitry on external surfaces. The second, fully additive route builds the mechanical structural substrate and embeds the active electronics inside the volume concurrently, creating a fully sealed and encapsulated system.
By exploiting these dual manufacturing pathways, designers can break free from the spatial constraints of traditional packaging. This enabling technology is critical for next-generation hardware where spatial envelope constraints are extreme, such as aerospace sensors, medical implants, and compact optoelectronic devices.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The technical definition of 3D printed electronics and its role in creating mechatronic systems.
* The difference between printing on existing 3D surfaces versus a fully additive co-deposition process.
* How internal electronic components can be buried and routed inside a monolithic structural part.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This clip defines the core paradigm shift of 3D printed electronics as the combination of printed conductive traces and surface-mount devices onto or within 3D structural parts. It details the two primary manufacturing routes: printing on pre-existing mechanical substrates versus a fully additive process where the structure and circuit are built simultaneously.
#StructuralElectronics, #3DPrintedElectronics, #EmbeddedElectronics, #MechatronicIntegratedDevices, #AdditiveElectronics, #PrintedElectronics
02:49 - 04:52
Why is a single deposition process fundamentally incapable of printing complex 3D structural electronics?
Can the elimination of the planar printed circuit board redefine the economics and architecture of mechatronic systems?
The transition from conventional planar 2D printed circuit boards (PCBs) to fully integrated 3D printed electronics represents a paradigm shift in structural design. By depositing conductive pathways directly onto or within three-dimensional mechanical structures, designers can bypass the spatial constraints of rigid, flat substrates. This high level of integration enables complex, flexible form factors and significant miniaturization, allowing electronic functionality to conform precisely to the physical envelope of the device.
Beyond mere space savings, this additive approach embeds active functionality—such as sensing intelligence and communication capabilities—directly into previously inert mechanical components. This transition from passive housings to intelligent mechatronic systems is further enhanced by streamlined manufacturing logistics. Eliminating the discrete PCB reduces overall parts counts and simplifies assembly, paving the way for fully automated production lines that replace labor-intensive manual assembly processes.
From a materials perspective, 3D printed electronics offer a highly sustainable alternative to traditional subtractive manufacturing. Conventional PCB fabrication relies on wasteful deposit-and-etch processes, whereas additive manufacturing deposits functional materials precisely where they are required, minimizing waste. This shorter process chain not only reduces the materials mix to simplify end-of-life recycling but also optimizes resource efficiency across the entire product lifecycle.
In this short video, you can learn:
* How transitioning from planar 2D PCBs to 3D integrated electronics enables superior miniaturization and flexible form factors.
* The pathway to transforming inert mechanical structures into intelligent, communicating mechatronic systems.
* The economic and environmental advantages of additive manufacturing, including reduced parts counts, automated assembly, and minimized material waste.
📋 **Clip Abstract** The speaker discusses the multifaceted benefits of transitioning from planar 2D PCBs to integrated 3D printed electronics, highlighting advantages in miniaturization, spatial efficiency, and structural intelligence. He also outlines the economic and environmental value of this additive approach, emphasizing reduced parts counts, simplified process chains, automated manufacturing, and minimized material waste.
🎤 Speaker: Martin Hedges
🏢 Company: Neotech AMT
📅 Event: The Future of Electronics RESHAPED 2023 Berlin
📍 Location: Estrel Congress Centre, Berlin, Germany, Europe
🌐 Learn more at the next TechBlick event: https://www.techblick.com
#StructuralElectronics, #FiveAxisCNC, #AerosolJetPrinting, #InSituSintering, #AdditiveElectronics, #3DPrintedElectronics