Matjaž Finžgar | INO, d.o.o.: How does a modular machine design de-risk capital investment in printed electronics manufacturing?
00:05:39 - 00:06:00
Other snippets from this talk
Summary of the clip:
How does a modular machine design de-risk capital investment in printed electronics manufacturing?
The speaker introduces the modular M system as a solution to the challenges of scaling production in printed electronics. This system is designed to allow customers to grow their production capacity incrementally, step by step. Instead of requiring a complete machine replacement with each scale-up, the modular design allows for upgrades to the same core system.
This approach is presented as a way to make investments safer and more stable. By upgrading rather than replacing, companies can avoid the significant capital expenditure associated with purchasing entirely new equipment. The modularity allows for a more gradual and financially manageable expansion of production capabilities.
The core idea is to provide a flexible platform that adapts to the evolving needs of the customer, reducing the risk of investing in equipment that may become obsolete or insufficient as production demands increase. This modularity is intended to provide a more sustainable and cost-effective path to scaling production.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The core concept of the modular M system for printed electronics production.
* How the system allows for incremental growth and upgrades.
* The benefits of this approach in terms of investment safety and stability.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This segment introduces the modular M system, emphasizing its ability to facilitate incremental scaling and reduce investment risk. The core concept revolves around upgrading the same core system rather than replacing it entirely.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#ModularMachineDesign, #PrintedElectronicsManufacturing, #IncrementalProductionScaling, #FlexibleManufacturingPlatform, #AdvancedManufacturing, #FlexibleElectronics
This is a highlight of the presentation:
From R&D to high volume production and importance of modular equipment which is able to upgrade based on stage of production.
More Highlights from the same talk.
00:06:17 - 00:07:57
How do you manage accumulated micro-scale tolerances across an eight-layer functional ink stack?
How do you manage accumulated micro-scale tolerances across an eight-layer functional ink stack?
In functional and printed electronics, stacking multiple material layers introduces cumulative registration and mechanical tolerances that can quickly cause product failure. This segment details the architecture of an eight-layer capacitive keyboard printed on polycarbonate, showcasing the transition from visual layers to functional active layers.
The layout details how white and black graphic layers define appearance, followed by a black opacity layer, dielectric UV separators, conductive silver circuits, NFC antenna bridges, and protective carbon contact zones. Each interface represents a critical boundary where chemical compatibility, adhesion, and thickness must be strictly controlled.
Managing these diverse material properties requires a stable, repeatable industrial process. Controlling the interface behavior between conductive metallic tracks, insulating dielectrics, and resistive carbon is key to ensuring electrical performance and long-term mechanical durability under repeated tactile cycling.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The specific layer architecture of an eight-layer capacitive printed circuit.
* The functional roles of dielectric separators, conductive silver, and carbon contacts.
* How interface control and registration tolerances accumulate across multi-step processes.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This clip breaks down the eight-layer material stack required to manufacture a fully functional capacitive keyboard using screen printing. It explains how visual graphic inks, UV dielectrics, conductive silver, and carbon contacts interact and why controlling cumulative variation is critical.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#MultiLayerScreenPrinting, #LayerRegistration, #PrintedCapacitiveSensors, #FunctionalInkStack, #PrintedElectronics, #AdditiveElectronics
00:13:02 - 00:13:57
Can you physically stretch or contract a screen print to compensate for thermal substrate distortion?
Can you physically stretch or contract a screen print to compensate for thermal substrate distortion?
Thermal curing profiles vary wildly between graphic inks and highly conductive silver inks, with temperatures shifting from 60 degrees Celsius up to 140 degrees Celsius. These thermal cycles induce dimensional drift, substrate shrinkage, and expansion, leading to length variations along the printing direction.
To maintain geometry across multiple printing cycles, a print length correction system is introduced. Rather than treating the substrate as a static canvas, the printing table dynamically micro-adjusts its position during the active print stroke to actively prolong or contract the print layout.
This active compensation system ensures that the final cured functional geometries match the target design file, nullifying the mechanical and thermal variation of the organic carrier substrate.
In this short video, you can learn:
* How differential thermal curing cycles drive dimensional drift and substrate shrinkage.
* The mechanism of dynamic print length correction during the active printing stroke.
* Practical methods to compensate for mechanical variations in multi-pass screen printing.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This segment addresses the critical problem of dimensional drift caused by thermal expansion and ink curing during multi-layer functional printing. It demonstrates how dynamic print length correction micro-adjusts the printing table during operation to maintain absolute geometric consistency.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#DynamicPrintLengthCorrection, #DimensionalDrift, #MultiPassScreenPrinting, #SubstrateDistortion, #PrintedElectronics, #FlexibleElectronics
00:10:11 - 00:11:19
Why is edge-detection registration alone insufficient for high-precision, multi-layer functional printing?
Why is edge-detection registration alone insufficient for high-precision, multi-layer functional printing?
Achieving sub-micron alignment accuracy across eight sequentially printed layers is a major challenge when dealing with thick, rigid substrates like two-millimeter polycarbonate. Variations in substrate cutting edges and the presence of protective films introduce optical irregularities that defeat traditional edge-detection methods.
To overcome this, a dual-mode camera-based positioning system is deployed. The system utilizes CCD cameras to capture substrate edges for the initial baseline layer, then dynamically switches to target-based registration utilizing previously printed registration marks for all subsequent layers.
The final micro-alignments are executed via high-resolution, closed-loop servo-driven adjustments. This dual-method approach isolates physical edge tolerances from the functional print pattern, securing highly precise layer-to-layer registration.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The limitations of edge-based optical registration on rigid substrates with cut imperfections.
* How a dual-mode CCD camera system transitions from edge reference to printed targets.
* The role of closed-loop servo adjustments in eliminating cumulative alignment errors.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This video highlights the registration challenges of aligning eight printed layers on thick polycarbonate substrates. The speaker details a dual-mode camera registration method that switches from edge-detection to printed target alignment to achieve reliable multi-layer registration.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#TargetBasedRegistration, #PolycarbonateSubstrates, #ClosedLoopServoAlignment, #MultiLayerPrinting, #PrintedElectronics, #AdditiveElectronics




