Michael Friess | Blackleaf: What are the key performance differences between traditional carbon inks and graphene-based inks for printed electronics?
00:07:01 - 00:07:21
Other snippets from this talk
Summary of the clip:
What are the key performance differences between traditional carbon inks and graphene-based inks for printed electronics?
The speaker contrasts the performance characteristics of traditional carbon inks with those of graphene-based inks developed by Blackleaf. Traditional carbon inks typically require a high solid content, ranging from 25% to 40%, to achieve adequate conductivity. Even with this high loading, they might only reach around 80 ohms per square at a dried film thickness of 36 micrometers. The resistivity of these inks tends to remain relatively constant, regardless of changes in thickness.
In contrast, Blackleaf's graphene ink achieves comparable performance with significantly lower graphene content, requiring only 3% graphene to reach 6 ohms per square at a thinner 15-micrometer dried film thickness. The total solid content of the graphene ink is also much lower, around 5-6%. This difference highlights the superior conductivity of graphene compared to traditional carbon materials.
Furthermore, the graphene ink offers a wider range of resistivity compared to traditional carbon inks. While traditional inks provide a relatively fixed resistivity, the graphene ink allows for adjusting the resistivity from 6 to 80 ohms per square simply by varying the thickness of the printed layer. This tunability provides greater design flexibility for heating applications.
In this short video, you can learn:
* Traditional carbon inks need high solid content for conductivity.
* Graphene inks achieve better performance with much lower material loading.
* Graphene inks offer tunable resistivity by varying the coating thickness.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This segment compares the performance of traditional carbon inks and Blackleaf's graphene-based inks, highlighting the superior conductivity and tunability of the graphene ink, which requires significantly lower material loading and offers a wider range of resistivity.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#GrapheneInk, #CarbonInk, #PrintedElectronics, #ResistivityTunability, #SemiconductorMaterials, #FlexibleElectronics
This is a highlight of the presentation:
Graphene-based Electric Heating : how graphene films are reinventing surface heating in the industry
More Highlights from the same talk.
00:02:33 - 00:04:11
Are all "graphene" materials the same?
Are all "graphene" materials the same?
Graphene is a non-metallic, 2D sheet of carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice, discovered just over 20 years ago. This unique one-atom-thick structure gives it remarkable properties, including exceptional thermal and electrical conductivity and high flexibility, making it a promising material for next-generation electronics and heating elements.
However, in an industrial context, the term "graphene" encompasses a wide range of materials with vastly different properties. These include ideal single-layer graphene (SLG), few-layer graphene (FLG) with 2-5 layers, multi-layer graphene (MLG) with over 10 layers, and graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) with over 30 layers. As the number of layers increases, the material's properties begin to shift away from those of ideal graphene and closer to those of bulk graphite.
This distinction is critical for product development and application performance. Blackleaf specializes in producing Few-Layer Graphene (FLG), which retains properties very close to those of ideal single-layer graphene. When integrating graphene into a product, it is essential to understand which specific type is being used, as the performance of a multi-layer nanoplatelet will be significantly different from that of a high-quality FLG.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The fundamental structure and properties of ideal graphene.
* The different classifications of industrial graphene materials (SLG, FLG, MLG, GNP).
* Why understanding the specific type of graphene is critical for application performance.
📋 **Clip Abstract** Not all materials marketed as graphene are created equal. This clip explains the critical differences between single-layer, few-layer, and multi-layer graphene, highlighting why the specific type used is crucial for achieving high performance in industrial applications.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#FewLayerGraphene, #GrapheneNanoplatelets, #2DCarbonMaterials, #GrapheneLayerCount, #PrintedElectronics, #FlexibleElectronics
00:10:17 - 00:11:48
Can a printed heater deliver over 6 W/cm² and still be cured on paper?
Can a printed heater deliver over 6 W/cm² and still be cured on paper?
This clip dives into the key technical specifications of Blackleaf's latest graphene-based heating ink, highlighting its readiness for demanding industrial applications. As a mono-component, water-based system, it simplifies processing while offering a high maximum operating temperature of 120°C, with formulations available to go even higher for specialized needs like aerospace de-icing.
A standout feature is the ink's exceptional power density, capable of reaching up to 6 watts per square centimeter. This high-power capability is critical for rapid and intense heating applications where quick thermal response is required, such as automotive seat heaters or de-icing systems for critical components. This level of performance is achieved without compromising the integrity or reliability of the printed film.
The ink also demonstrates remarkable process versatility. It can be fully cured in just 5-10 minutes at a low temperature of 100°C, making it compatible with a wide array of heat-sensitive substrates, including paper, textiles, and various flexible or rigid polymers. Furthermore, it's not limited to 2D screen printing; a sprayable version is available for conformally coating complex 3D surfaces, significantly expanding its application scope.
In this short video, you can learn:
* Key performance metrics including a power density of up to 6 W/cm².
* Low-temperature curing (100°C) enabling use on sensitive substrates like paper and textiles.
* Versatile deposition methods, including screen printing and spraying for 3D objects.
📋 **Clip Abstract** Explore the impressive technical datasheet of a high-performance graphene heating ink. Learn about its high power density, low-temperature curing process, and compatibility with a wide range of substrates from flexible polymers to textiles.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#GrapheneHeatingInk, #HighPowerDensity, #LowTempCuring, #PrintedHeaters, #PrintedElectronics, #FlexibleElectronics
00:05:04 - 00:07:40
How can a graphene ink with only 3% active material outperform a carbon ink with over 25%?
How can a graphene ink with only 3% active material outperform a carbon ink with over 25%?
This clip presents a direct, data-driven comparison between a typical carbon-based heating ink and Blackleaf's B13 graphene ink. A standard carbon ink requires a high solid content of over 25% to achieve a sheet resistance of around 18 ohms/square, which necessitates a thick dry coating of 36 micrometers. This high loading and thickness limit its performance and define a very narrow processing window.
In stark contrast, the B13 graphene ink achieves a much lower sheet resistance of 6 ohms/square with a significantly thinner layer of just 15 micrometers. This superior performance is accomplished with a remarkably low total solid content of only 8%, of which just 3% is the active graphene material. This efficiency stems from the high intrinsic conductivity and 2D sheet morphology of the few-layer graphene, which allows for excellent electrical percolation at very low concentrations.
The performance graph reveals the most significant advantage: the operational window. While conventional carbon inks are only stable and usable within a very narrow range of coating thicknesses before their properties change unpredictably, the graphene ink exhibits stable, repeatable resistivity across an exceptionally wide range of dry thicknesses, from 8 to over 40 micrometers. This unique behavior provides unprecedented process tolerance, reliability, and design flexibility for manufacturing printed heaters.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The performance difference between low-loading graphene and high-loading carbon inks.
* How to achieve 3x lower sheet resistance with less than half the coating thickness.
* The concept of a wide, stable processing window for printed electronics and its advantages.
📋 **Clip Abstract** This analysis reveals the superior performance of a low-loading graphene ink compared to traditional carbon inks. Discover how it achieves significantly lower sheet resistance at a fraction of the material loading and thickness, while offering a uniquely wide and stable processing window.
🔗 Link in comments 👇
#GrapheneInk, #PrintedHeaters, #ProcessingWindow, #SheetResistance, #PrintedElectronics, #FlexibleElectronics




