Neil Chilton | Printed Electronics Limited: What are the fundamental limitations preventing wider adoption of inkjet printing for conductive inks?
00:08:51 - 00:09:02
Other snippets from this talk
Summary of the clip:
What are the fundamental limitations preventing wider adoption of inkjet printing for conductive inks?
The speaker addresses the reasons why inkjet printing has not achieved the widespread adoption initially anticipated within the printed electronics sector. A primary limitation lies in the composition of inkjet inks, which typically consist of a high percentage of solvent. This high solvent content, often around 95% by volume or 40% by weight, is necessary to achieve the low viscosity required for inkjet dispensing.
The need to evaporate the solvent after printing presents several challenges. The evaporation process can lead to undesirable effects on the printed material, potentially compromising its properties or dimensional accuracy. Furthermore, the low solids loading of inkjet inks, combined with the solvent evaporation, results in thin layers that may not meet the conductivity or thickness requirements of certain electronic applications.
The speaker contrasts this with graphics or UV-curable inks, where the solvent content is less of a concern. However, for conductive metal-based inks, the high solvent content and low solids loading pose significant obstacles to achieving high-performance printed electronics. This limitation motivates the exploration of alternative additive technologies capable of handling high viscosity inks with higher solids loading.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The high solvent content of inkjet inks.
* The challenges associated with solvent evaporation.
* The limitations of inkjet printing for conductive metal-based inks.
š **Clip Abstract** The speaker explains the fundamental limitations of inkjet printing for conductive inks, focusing on the high solvent content and low solids loading required for the process. The challenges associated with solvent evaporation and the resulting thin layers are highlighted as key factors hindering wider adoption.
š Link in comments š
#InkjetPrinting, #ConductiveInks, #SolventEvaporation, #LowSolidsLoading, #PrintedElectronics, #SemiconductorManufacturing
This is a highlight of the presentation:
Drop-on-Demand Printing of Highly Viscous Inks
More Highlights from the same talk.
00:05:05 - 00:06:15
Why is a centuries-old printing method still the default choice for high-tech electronics?
Why is a centuries-old printing method still the default choice for high-tech electronics?
After 20 years of experience in the industry, screen printing remains the go-to process for printed electronics, especially when the ideal manufacturing method isn't immediately obvious. The primary reason for its dominance is the maturity and excellence of the available functional inks and the robustness of the associated manufacturing processes. It provides a well-understood, reliable, and scalable starting point for both development and high-volume production.
The capabilities of screen printing have been continuously pushed, largely driven by the demanding requirements of the photovoltaics industry. Groundbreaking work by institutions like Fraunhofer ISE has demonstrated that screen printing can achieve incredibly fine features, with line widths now reaching as low as 14 microns. This constant improvement in resolution keeps the technology at the forefront and competitive with other digital deposition methods for many high-resolution applications.
This ongoing advancement means that for commercial applications, achieving features from 100 microns down to 30 microns is now a standard, reliable capability, provided you use a high-quality ink and a suitable substrate. This combination of fine-line resolution, large-area coverage, high throughput, and process maturity gives screen printing a unique and powerful position in the additive electronics landscape.
In this short video, you can learn:
* Why screen printing is the default "first refusal" process in printed electronics.
* How the photovoltaics industry has driven screen printing resolution down to 14 microns.
* What feature sizes (30-100 microns) are realistically achievable in commercial production.
š **Clip Abstract**
Neil Chilton of Printed Electronics Ltd. explains why screen printing, an ancient technology, remains the dominant and default process for manufacturing printed electronics. He highlights its robust ink ecosystem and how advancements in photovoltaics have pushed its resolution capabilities to an impressive 14 microns.
š Link in comments š
#ScreenPrinting, #PrintedElectronics, #FineLineResolution, #FunctionalInks, #FlexibleElectronics, #WearableElectronics
00:12:24 - 00:13:28
For high-resolution printing, line quality is key, but what about process *stability* over time?
For high-resolution printing, line quality is key, but what about process *stability* over time?
When selecting a deposition technology for features under 50 microns, process ease-of-use and stability are just as important as ultimate resolution. From extensive experience with multiple fine-line techniques, aerosol jetting stands out as one of the more manageable and relevant processes in this domain. A key reason for this is the exceptional longevity and consistency of its print quality during operation.
A significant practical advantage of aerosol jetting is its process stability over extended print runs. Once the parameters are dialed in, the system can print a continuous, high-quality line for many minutes without any degradation in its characteristics. This is a critical factor for manufacturing, as it ensures uniformity and reliability across a large or complex part, reducing defects and the need for constant process adjustments.
While typically known for its fine-line capabilities, with the ability to print sub-30 micron features, recent developments have expanded the application space for aerosol jetting. The technology is now proven to be capable of printing very wide lines, up to 700 or 800 microns in a single pass. This dual capability allows it to be used for both high-resolution interconnects and for efficiently depositing larger areas of material, increasing its versatility and productivity.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The key advantage of aerosol jetting's process stability for long print runs.
* Why print quality longevity is a critical factor for manufacturing reliability.
* How recent advancements enable aerosol jetting to print wide lines (up to 800 microns), not just fine features.
š **Clip Abstract**
Neil Chilton reveals a critical, experience-based insight into aerosol jetting: its exceptional process stability, allowing for consistent, high-quality printing over many minutes. He also discusses new developments that expand its capability from just fine lines to wide-area deposition up to 800 microns.
š Link in comments š
#AerosolJetting, #ProcessStability, #FineLineDeposition, #WideLinePrinting, #PrintedElectronics, #AdditiveElectronics
00:07:52 - 00:09:29
Printing electronics directly onto fabric seems ideal for wearables, but what critical manufacturing defects does this method introduce?
Printing electronics directly onto fabric seems ideal for wearables, but what critical manufacturing defects does this method introduce?
When manufacturing electronics for wearables, printing directly onto a fabric presents significant challenges that can compromise product reliability. The inherent movement and instability of the textile fibers under the ink during the printing process can induce a high number of microscopic defects in the printed traces. This material instability makes direct printing a risky approach for robust commercial products that need to withstand wear and washing.
A further practical issue arises from the manufacturing equipment itself. Most high-precision screen printers use a vacuum bed to hold the substrate perfectly flat and stationary during the print cycle. As fabrics are porous, it is impossible to create a proper vacuum seal, which leads to poor registration between layers, inconsistent ink deposition, and a generally messy and unreliable printing process.
The preferred industrial solution to these problems is the decal transfer method. This technique involves screen printing the multi-layer electronic circuit onto a stable, sacrificial transfer material first. The completed, quality-checked circuit is then laminated onto the final textile using a heat press, ensuring a high-quality, defect-free integration that bypasses the inherent problems of printing directly onto an unstable, porous surface.
In this short video, you can learn:
* The primary causes of defects when printing electronics directly onto textiles.
* Why standard vacuum-bed screen printers are incompatible with porous fabric substrates.
* How the decal transfer method provides a robust and reliable alternative for creating e-textiles.
š **Clip Abstract**
Discover the critical manufacturing challenges of printing electronics directly onto fabrics for wearable applications. Neil Chilton details why this approach often fails and presents the decal transfer method as a superior industrial solution for creating robust and reliable e-textiles.
š Link in comments š
#DirectFabricPrinting, #PrintedElectronicsDefects, #VacuumBedScreenPrinting, #DecalTransferMethod, #WearableElectronics, #ETextiles




