top of page

Johanna Zikulnig

Silicon Austria Labs

* All members of the platform can watch the entire presentation.

 

Please register to become a member.

Johanna Zikulnig | Silicon Austria Labs: Why are standard Life Cycle Assessments dangerously blind to the long-term nanoparticle toxicity of landfilled printed electronics?

00:05:34 - 00:07:37

Other snippets from this talk

Summary of the clip:

Why are standard Life Cycle Assessments dangerously blind to the long-term nanoparticle toxicity of landfilled printed electronics?

Evaluating the end-of-life impact of printed sensors reveals a critical blind spot in standard Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs). When biodegradable carbon-based substrates degrade in landfills, they release greenhouse gases that contribute to Global Warming Potential (GWP). Conversely, metallic electrodes and silicon chips do not degrade and thus do not directly generate greenhouse emissions, making them appear deceptively benign in simplified, GWP-focused LCA models.

The real environmental hazard lies in the persistence of metallic nanoparticles, such as copper, silver, and zinc oxide, in the soil. Although sintering processes like intense pulsed light (IPL) or laser curing are designed to bind these nanoparticles, complete sintering is rarely guaranteed throughout thick or multi-layered printed features, leaving free or unbound nanoparticles behind.

Over time, these unreacted nanoparticles leach out of discarded sensors and accumulate in soil, plants, and animal tissue. To truly assess the ecological footprint of printed and hybrid electronics, researchers must shift from simple carbon-footprint metrics to comprehensive ecotoxicity evaluations that account for heavy metal leaching and nanoparticle bioaccumulation.

In this short video, you can learn:
* Why standard GWP metrics fail to capture the long-term environmental impact of non-degradable sensor components.
* The processing limitations of laser and IPL curing that leave unbound, free nanoparticles in printed layers.
* How residual copper, silver, and zinc oxide nanoparticles accumulate in ecosystems when sensors are landfilled.

📋 **Clip Abstract** Johanna Zikulnig details why standard Life Cycle Assessments fail to capture the environmental risks of landfilled printed electronics. She highlights the persistence of unsintered metallic nanoparticles in the soil, raising critical questions about ecotoxicity and processing quality control.

#NanoparticleEcotoxicity, #IPLSintering, #HeavyMetalLeaching, #PrintedSensors, #PrintedElectronics, #SustainableElectronics

This is a highlight of the presentation:

Additive, Sustainable or 3D Electronics Innovations Day 2025

Perovskites Innovation Day 2025

04.04.2025

TechBlick Online Platform

Organised By:

TechBlick

More Highlights from the same talk.

00:01:34 - 00:03:21

Are "green" single-use printed sensors actually creating an unmanaged, toxic waste stream outside of traditional e-waste recycling?

Are "green" single-use printed sensors actually creating an unmanaged, toxic waste stream outside of traditional e-waste recycling?

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT), point-of-care diagnostics, and smart packaging is driving a massive surge in the printed sensor market. However, because these sensors are integrated into single-use packaging and hygienic medical devices, they rarely enter standard electronic waste (e-waste) recycling streams. Instead, they end up in municipal or medical waste, leading to a permanent loss of strategic raw materials like silver and copper.

This divergence in waste streams poses a significant challenge for environmental compliance and resource circularity. While traditional PCBs are heavily regulated under e-waste directives, printed sensors integrated directly into paper or plastic substrates bypass these collection systems. This makes recovering valuable conductive elements highly inefficient with current municipal sorting technologies.

To address this gap, materials scientists must develop scalable design-for-disposal methodologies that allow printed metallizations to be easily separated or safely composted. Without a proactive shift toward transient electronics or specialized recovery channels, the environmental footprint of ubiquitous sensing could negate the resource-saving benefits of additive manufacturing.

In this short video, you can learn:
* The unexpected waste destinations of single-use printed sensors outside traditional e-waste streams.
* Why strategic raw materials like silver and copper are permanently lost in municipal and medical waste.
* The material and regulatory challenges of managing highly integrated, short-lifetime smart packaging.

📋 **Clip Abstract** This clip explores how the rise of single-use printed sensors in healthcare and smart packaging creates an unmanaged waste loop outside traditional e-waste channels. Scientist Johanna Zikulnig highlights the urgent need to address the permanent loss of strategic materials like copper and silver when these devices end up in municipal waste.

#TransientElectronics, #DesignForDisposal, #PrintedSensors, #SmartPackaging, #PrintedElectronics, #CircularElectronics

00:09:00 - 00:11:09

Why is recovering high-value printed silver and copper from municipal incineration and recycling streams practically impossible today?

Why is recovering high-value printed silver and copper from municipal incineration and recycling streams practically impossible today?

While incineration with energy recovery is often proposed for printed electronic waste, non-carbon components like metallic electrodes and silicon chips do not burn. Instead, these micro- and nanoscale metallic particles melt and accumulate within the bottom ash and fly ash of incineration facilities. Although some macro-scale metal recovery is common in waste management, separating and reclaiming ultra-fine printed metal particles from ash remains economically and technically unfeasible.

This creates a significant material circularity gap because these printed metals, which could theoretically be recycled indefinitely with up to an 80% reduction in CO2 emissions, end up in construction aggregates or landfills. The value of these strategic metals is permanently lost, even if the high temperatures of incineration melt them into larger, less bioavailable compounds.

The root of the problem is that there is currently no efficient industrial-scale recycling method in place to separate printed metallic traces from plastic or paper substrates before disposal. Developing advanced separation technologies, such as sacrificial release layers, is crucial to transitioning printed electronics from a linear "use-and-lose" model to a true circular economy.

In this short video, you can learn:
* The fate of metallic electrodes during waste incineration and their accumulation in bottom and fly ash.
* Why recovering ultra-fine printed metal particles from municipal ash remains economically unfeasible.
* The gap between theoretical infinite metal recyclability and the lack of practical separation methods for printed devices.

📋 **Clip Abstract** This segment exposes the severe limitations of current waste management systems in reclaiming precious metals from incinerated or recycled printed sensors. Scientist Johanna Zikulnig explains why fine metallic traces end up permanently lost in bottom ash, underscoring the urgent need for design-for-recycling innovations.

#SacrificialReleaseLayers, #BottomAshRecovery, #PrintedMetalRecycling, #FineParticleSeparation, #PrintedElectronics, #CircularElectronics

More Snippets
CONTACT US

KGH Concepts GmbH

Mergenthalerallee 73-75, 65760, Eschborn

+49 17661704139

venessa@techblick.com

TechBlick is owned and operated by KGH Concepts GmbH

Registration number HRB 121362

VAT number: DE 337022439

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Sign up for our newsletter to receive updates on our latest speakers and events AND to receive analyst-written summaries of the key talks and happenings in our events.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2026 by KGH Concepts GmbH

bottom of page