top of page

Julio Gomez

Avanzare

* All members of the platform can watch the entire presentation.

 

Please register to become a member.

Julio Gomez | Avanzare: Why is using Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) for thermal dissipation a fundamental material design error?

11:26 - 12:44

Other snippets from this talk

Summary of the clip:

Why is using Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) for thermal dissipation a fundamental material design error?

The selection of the appropriate graphene variant must be guided by the fundamental physical mechanisms governing the target property. For thermal conductivity, using graphene oxide (GO) or reduced graphene oxide (RGO) is highly ineffective. This is because the structural and chemical defects inherent in these processed sheets disrupt the carbon crystal lattice, scattering phonons and severely limiting thermal transport.

Conversely, to optimize both electrical and thermal pathways, engineers must deploy pristine graphene with large lateral sheet dimensions and minimal thickness. These geometric properties minimize boundary contact resistance and allow for low percolation thresholds, significantly improving macroscopic transport properties at low weight loadings within the matrix.

However, morphology choices are constrained by the manufacturing process of the composite itself. For instance, in hierarchical composites processed via liquid composite molding or resin infusion techniques, large lateral sheets act as physical filters, clogging the fiber preform and preventing uniform dispersion.

In this short video, you can learn:
* Why structural defects in RGO and GO block phonon transport and destroy thermal conductivity.
* The geometric sweet spot of high lateral size and minimal thickness for low percolation thresholds.
* The processing bottleneck of using large-sheet 2D materials in resin infusion and infiltration techniques.

📋 **Clip Abstract** This clip explains the physics behind choosing the correct graphene morphology and purity based on transport properties. It highlights the critical trade-off between maximizing sheet dimensions for electrical/thermal performance and minimizing them to avoid filtration issues during composite infusion.

#PhononTransport, #ReducedGrapheneOxide, #ResinInfusion, #PercolationThreshold, #ThermalManagement, #PolymerComposites

This is a highlight of the presentation:

Graphene & 2D Materials 2021: End Users, Applications, Major Producers & Start Up 2021

TechBlick Platform Online

Organised By:

TechBlick

More Highlights from the same talk.

15:37 - 16:25

What are the primary industrial exfoliation methods used to produce commercial graphene at scale?

What are the primary industrial exfoliation methods used to produce commercial graphene at scale?

Commercial production of graphene relies almost exclusively on top-down exfoliation methodologies starting from natural graphite. To target specific surface chemistries and morphologies, manufacturers must run multiple parallel chemical and physical processing routes. This includes traditional chemical oxidation to produce graphene oxide, followed by thermal or chemical reduction to yield reduced graphene oxide.

For high-purity applications requiring low defect counts, liquid-phase exfoliation offers a pristine alternative, though it typically yields flakes with smaller lateral dimensions. Other high-volume manufacturing routes include graphite intercalation followed by thermal shock (super-expansion), as well as electrochemical exfoliation.

Of these diverse top-down methods, chemical oxidation/reduction, liquid-phase exfoliation, and intercalation-expansion remain the dominant industrial pillars. These three methods account for the vast majority of global tonnage due to their scalability and control over the resulting 2D morphology.

In this short video, you can learn:
* The breakdown of the top-down industrial pathways used to exfoliate bulk graphite into 2D sheets.
* Why liquid-phase exfoliation yields higher-purity materials at the expense of lateral sheet size.
* The three dominant scaling methodologies that produce the bulk of commercial graphene volumes today.

📋 **Clip Abstract** This technical segment outlines the five main top-down exfoliation techniques used by industrial manufacturers to produce graphene. The speaker identifies which three methodologies are currently viable for high-volume commercial production.

#LiquidPhaseExfoliation, #GrapheneOxide, #GraphiteIntercalation, #TopDownExfoliation, #2DMaterials, #PrintedElectronics

16:35 - 17:58

Why is selling raw graphene powder a commercial dead end for material suppliers?

Why is selling raw graphene powder a commercial dead end for material suppliers?

Graphene's extraordinarily high specific surface area and low bulk density present severe handling, safety, and dispersion challenges in industrial environments. Because raw dry powders easily become airborne and self-agglomerate due to strong van der Waals forces, selling pristine powder is highly impractical for mass manufacturing. To overcome this, over 90% of commercial graphene must be delivered in the form of pre-dispersed nano-intermediates.

These intermediates are engineered to integrate seamlessly into existing chemical process lines. Depending on the downstream industry, graphene is pre-formulated into liquid dispersions using water or organic solvents, masterbatches for thermoplastic compounding, or liquid resins and polyols for thermoset and polyurethane foaming.

Providing masterbatches and solid dispersions is the key to unlocking major commercial volume in regions like Europe and Asia. By supplying ready-to-use nano-intermediates, material suppliers eliminate the need for end-users to invest in expensive high-shear dispersion equipment.

In this short video, you can learn:
* Why bulk density and surface area force manufacturers to supply graphene as pre-dispersed intermediates.
* The range of delivery formats including solvent dispersions, masterbatches, and polyol-compatible resins.
* How pre-formulated nano-intermediates lower the technical barrier to entry for high-volume industrial adoption.

📋 **Clip Abstract** This segment addresses the processing realities of integrating graphene into industrial polymer lines. The speaker explains why the vast majority of commercial material is sold as liquid or thermoplastic masterbatches rather than dry powders.

#GrapheneDispersion, #NanoIntermediates, #PolymerCompounding, #ThermoplasticMasterbatches, #PrintedElectronics, #AdvancedMaterials

More Snippets
CONTACT US

KGH Concepts GmbH

Mergenthalerallee 73-75, 65760, Eschborn

+49 17661704139

venessa@techblick.com

TechBlick is owned and operated by KGH Concepts GmbH

Registration number HRB 121362

VAT number: DE 337022439

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Sign up for our newsletter to receive updates on our latest speakers and events AND to receive analyst-written summaries of the key talks and happenings in our events.

Thanks for submitting!

© 2026 by KGH Concepts GmbH

bottom of page